Document Type

Article

Journal/Book Title/Conference

Science Education

Volume

96

Issue

4

Editor

Gregory Kelly

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Publication Date

2012

First Page

572

Last Page

599

Abstract

Researchers in the science education community make extensive use of cognitive clinical interviews as windows into student knowledge and thinking. Despite our familiarity with the interviews, there has been very limited research addressing the ways that students understand these interactions. In this work we examine students’ behaviors and speech patterns in a set of clinical interviews about chemistry for evidence of their tacit understandings and underlying expectations about the activity in which they are engaged. We draw on the construct of framing from anthropology and sociolinguistics and identify clusters of behaviors that indicate that students may alternatively frame the interview as Inquiry, an Oral Examination, or an Expert Interview. We present two examples of students shifting between frames during the course of individual interviews. By examining the surrounding interaction we identify both conceptual and epistemological interviewer cues that facilitate and constrain frame shifts. We discuss the implications of dynamic student framing, that is identifiable in student behaviors and discourse, for researchers who use clinical interviews to map student’s intuitive science knowledge.

DOI

10.1002/sce.21014

 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.