<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Woody Biomass Utilization Break-out Session</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Utah State University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2</link>
<description>Recent Events in Woody Biomass Utilization Break-out Session</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:10:55 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>New Developments in the World of Biomass Utilization</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/4</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The economic competitiveness  of cellulosic biofuels is highly dependent on feedstock cost, which  constitutes 35–50% of the total fuel production cost, depending on  geographical factors and equipment selection for harvesting, collecting,  preprocessing, transporting, and handling the material. Consequently,  feedstock cost and availability are the driving factors that influence  near-term biorefinery locations and will largely control the rate at  which this industry grows. Initial model-based supply scenarios  postulate a dry feedstock supply system design case as a demonstration  of the current state of technology. Based on this near-term design,  advanced scenarios were developed to determine key cost barriers, needed  supply improvements, and technology advancements to achieve long-term  cost targets. Near-term supply systems will start by using current  infrastructure and technologies and be individually designed for  biorefineries using specific feedstock types and varieties based on  local geographic conditions. However, as the industry develops, cost  barriers are addressed, and risks associated with large scale biomass  utilization are considered, the supply systems will incorporate advanced  technologies that will eliminate downstream diversity and provide a  uniform, tailored feedstock for multiple biorefineries located in  different regions. This advanced supply system will utilize current  handling infrastructure to move a quality controlled, desified, and  stable cellulosic feedstocks to biorefineries as a commodity material  similar to current grain and emerging wood commodities.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Christopher Write</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Marketing Strategies for Biomass Utilization</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The key marketing strategy for  improving Pinyon/Juniper biomass utilization is to discover the  customer value propositions (CVPs) that offer the greatest return and  then finding the lowest cost production processes that will deliver that  return. PJ, bless its heart, is a non-timber forest resource—apparently  lacking a high-value component to offset the high cost to fell and  remove the biomass called for in the prescription. But, there are  “bright spots”—products and bi-products that can go a long way to  provide the land managers revenue that can drive the restoration costs  to acceptable levels. Those CVPs can be shown as symbiotic relationships  and marketed as such. When relationship marketing is effective, people,  processes, and technology work in synergy to increase profitability,  and reduce costs.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dusty Moller</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Biomass Business Principles of Success</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/2</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Biomass Industry has many  characteristics of an infant industry but unlike an infant industry its  products are primarily energy commodities that can be obtained from many  sources. These characteristics create a multitude of risks. Risks are  in three main areas. The first set of risks are market risks. The second  set of risks are technology risks. The third set of risks are public  policy risks. Market risks include prices received, prices paid and  price volatility. Technology risks include current densification  technology costly. Most biomass technology was developed if the late  19th and early 20th centuries. Technology is changing with resent  renewed interest in biomass. Therefore, there is the risk of stranded  investment as new technologies displace current technologies. Public  policy risks are in three areas. First is withdrawal of public funding  for biomass. Second is policy changes effecting harvesting biomass on  public lands. Third is changes in environmental policies including CO²  regulation. Risk management is key to success in the biomass industry.  Market risks can be reduced through forward contracting. Technology  risks can be reduced by investing in technologies that have multiple  uses and spreading costs over many shareholders on single use  technologies. Public policy risks are difficult to manage but must be  evaluated in every business plan. Sensitivity analysis is essential in  determining the magnitude of risk associated with changes in any element  of the biomass enterprise.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gilbert Miller</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>The Economics of Biomass</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Breakout2/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Biomass feedstock supply chain  logistics and the associated costs are key to building a sustainable  biofuels industry, as biomass conversion facilities that rely on an  unsustainable biomass supply quickly become unsustainable to operate.  The US Department of Energy (DOE) has developed cost and quantity  targets for biofuels production, requiring large quantities of biomass  that meet aggressive cost targets. Analyses performed at the Idaho  National Laboratory (INL) have shown that these targets cannot be met  with conventional biomass logistics systems. Therefore, INL has  developed an advanced, commodity-based Uniform Format biomass feedstock  logistics system that addresses barriers to meeting these goals and  enables DOE targets to be met. This presentation will present some  analyses performed by INL to support the development of an advanced  biomass logistics system.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jared Abodeely</author>


</item>



</channel>
</rss>
