<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Plenary Session, October 18th</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Utah State University All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary</link>
<description>Recent Events in Plenary Session, October 18th</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:11:19 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Woody Biomass Utilization Update for Natural Resource Managers</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/5</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Since WWII we have worked hard  to stop forest fires. These efforts have resulted in more extreme fires  today because of all the available ladder fuels. Thinning can reduce or  even eliminate the catastrophic aspect of a fire but can the thinning’s  pay their way out of the forest? Uses from water filters to  wood/plastic composites will be discussed. Unfortunately energy is the  least valuable use.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mark Knaebe</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Energy Regulatory Policies Encouraging Biomass Power in the West</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/4</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Daniel R. Simon</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Towards a Cohesive Federal Policy on Wood Bioenergy</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Renewable energy sources  provided eight percent of the energy our nation consumed in 2010.  Biomass accounted for half of that, and wood was the largest subcategory  of biomass energy (“bioenergy”), followed closely by liquid  biofuels—each provided about 2 percent of our total energy needs. We  know how to use wood to make energy, and we have been doing it for a  long time. We could be doing more of it. Policy objectives for wood  bioenergy might include a) reducing fossil energy use and thereby  displacing reliance on foreign oil, b) improving forest health and  sustainability, in part by creating markets for forestry products, and  c) revitalizing rural economies via jobs. Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG)  emissions is another potential objective, but dependent on the  accounting stance towards sustainable forestry, which is currently a  regulatory uncertainty (and addressed in my closing presentation on “The  Forestry/Bioenergy/Carbon Connection”). Due to inattention to concerns  affecting the western states, the Western Governors’ Association (WGA)  in August 2010 wrote to President Barack Obama’s energy/climate advisor  calling for a cohesive federal wood bioenergy policy, and received no  response. A cohesive policy would have clearly specified objectives or  ends and then focus on providing means to attain ends. The WGA expressed  a sense of urgency and suggested that federal agencies actively engage  with the states to develop a clear and unambiguous federal policy for  wood bioenergy and make a top priority of attaining the multiple goals  of healthy forests, clean air, productive economies, and clean energy.  Specific areas needing improvement are a) the counterproductive  multitude of biomass definitions, b) bias towards liquid biofuels, and  c) land management policies that make removal of hazardous fuels  difficult at the scale needed to improve wildfire resiliency, which in  turn limits potential bioenergy feedstock supplies and other benefits  from active land management.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jay O&apos;Laughlin</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>The History of Biomass Utilization in the West: From Tee Pee Burners to Woody Biomass Derived Aviation Fuel</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/2</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Presentation  will cover the history of woody biomass in the Rocky Mountain West  (including Alaska), spanning a period of time from the late 60’s to 2011  and beyond. Two primary sources of woody biomass covered in this  presentation will be “mill residue” (sawdust, shavings, and bark) and  “in-woods” (generated from commercial logging operations and forest  restoration activities).</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Craig Rawlings</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Biomass Utilization: A Tool for Forest Restoration</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/rtw/2011/Plenary/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Forest Service mission is  to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s  forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future  generations. In this century, our forests and grasslands face serious  threats to their sustainability from a variety of stresses and  pressures. Foremost are climate change, altered disturbance regimes,  non-native invasive species, and increasing pressures and impacts from  an expanding human population. These diverse threats affect aquatic and  terrestrial ecosystems in virtually every region of the country.  Utilization of woody biomass generated from forest treatments can  provide jobs, stimulate the local economy and ultimately reduce the cost  of forest treatments.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mike Dudley</author>


</item>



</channel>
</rss>
