Document Type


Journal/Book Title/Conference

Economics Research Institute Study Paper




Utah State University Department of Economics

Publication Date



Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact the Institutional Repository Librarian at

First Page


Last Page



The conventional approach to determining the pecuniary damages in personal injury litigation is to discount future wages to present value using a discount rate based on current or historic interest rates on Treasury securities. In addition to overcompensating the plaintiff by providing a set of choices that could not otherwise be obtained in a world characterized by imperfect and incomplete capital markets, the degree of overcompensation is even greater when valuing employer contributions to a retirement program. This is the result of: (a) the restrictive nature of qualified retirement plans that greatly reduce their liquity; (b) the retirement fund may be invested in risky assets; and (c) the portfolio of assets may not meet the Markowitz efficiency standard. Two major themes are developed. First an analysis is made of the welfare gains to an individual who is awarded a large sum to replace future employee retirement contributions as a result of being able to access the capital market and to choose an efficient portfolio. Second, an analysis is made of the gains from being able to reallocate consumption intertemporally. J