Situating Structural Violence Within Peace: A Critical Study of Peacebuilding in Rwanda and Cambodia
Date of Award
5-2015
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Political Science
Committee Chair(s)
Colin Flint
Committee
Colin Flint
Committee
E. Helen Berry
Committee
Veronica Ward
Abstract
Many peace agreements fail despite external mediation and intervention, prompting a deconstruction of the predominant conceptions of peace and methods of peacebuilding. Of the weaknesses of these conceptions, the lack of concern for post-conflict structural violence is one of the strongest, and the main focus of this research. Infant mortality rate variations demonstrate the salience of structural violence in post-conflict situations. Further, to look deeper at the weaknesses of the hegemonic ideals on peace and its implementation by external actors, the cases of Rwanda and Cambodia are analyzed using the comparative method, and situated within critical peace literature. The comparison finds that rapid military integration may cause violence to restart, and that non-state entities appear more likely to be disarmed than recognized states during the post-conflict phase. This research also suggests that not disarming rebels in the peace process is an indication of a move towards a more just and inclusive society that will lead to a decrease in both direct and indirect violence, including a decrease in structural violence as indicated by a decline in the infant mortality rate.
Recommended Citation
Reeder, S. L., "Situating Structural Violence Within Peace: A Critical Study of Peacebuilding in Rwanda and Cambodia" (2015). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports, Spring 1920 to Spring 2023. 668.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/668
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .