Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Start Date
18-10-1987 12:00 AM
Description
We studied the home ranges and activity patterns of 24 white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in south-western Wisconsin via radio-telemetry and visual observation to determine their response to single-strand electric crop-protection fences. Deer were allowed to establish feeding patterns in alfalfa fields during the spring green-up periods of 1986 and 1987. In mid-April of each year, 7 fences were constructed around selected 7-25 ha alfalfa fields to exclude deer from varying portions of their home ranges. No fences were constructed around alfalfa fields in one area. Fences were built around 50 and 100% of the alfalfa in 2 other areas. Deer movements were monitored in each of the 3 areas.
Preliminary observations indicate that 1) marked and unmarked deer used alfalfa fields extensively from snowmelt to first cutting, 2) deer-use of alfalfa fields by deer decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after fences were installed in the 50 and 100% treatment areas. Conversely, deer in the 0% treatment area significantly (P < 0.05) increased their use of alfalfa fields after fences were installed, and 3) home ranges of deer in each of the treatment level areas decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in size after fences were installed. Deer limited their movements primarily to non-alfalfa areas within their pre-fencing home ranges. These results lend further support for the use of fences in deer damage control.
Recommended Citation
Hygnstrom, S. E., & Craven, S. R. (1987). Home range responses of white-tailed deer to crop-protection fences. In Holler, N. R. (Ed.), The Third Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference (pp. 128-131). Gulf Shores, AL: Auburn University.
Included in
Home Range Responses of White-Tailed Deer to Crop-Protection Fences
We studied the home ranges and activity patterns of 24 white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in south-western Wisconsin via radio-telemetry and visual observation to determine their response to single-strand electric crop-protection fences. Deer were allowed to establish feeding patterns in alfalfa fields during the spring green-up periods of 1986 and 1987. In mid-April of each year, 7 fences were constructed around selected 7-25 ha alfalfa fields to exclude deer from varying portions of their home ranges. No fences were constructed around alfalfa fields in one area. Fences were built around 50 and 100% of the alfalfa in 2 other areas. Deer movements were monitored in each of the 3 areas.
Preliminary observations indicate that 1) marked and unmarked deer used alfalfa fields extensively from snowmelt to first cutting, 2) deer-use of alfalfa fields by deer decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after fences were installed in the 50 and 100% treatment areas. Conversely, deer in the 0% treatment area significantly (P < 0.05) increased their use of alfalfa fields after fences were installed, and 3) home ranges of deer in each of the treatment level areas decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in size after fences were installed. Deer limited their movements primarily to non-alfalfa areas within their pre-fencing home ranges. These results lend further support for the use of fences in deer damage control.