Union Rents and Market Structure Revisited
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Journal of Labor Research
Volume
12
Publication Date
1991
First Page
35
Last Page
46
Abstract
Several recent studies give conflicting evidence on whether market power associated with industry concentration is an important source of union rents. Using a 1977 sample of 327 four-digit manufacturing industries, we re-examine the issue with a regression analysis that allows for differential union effects on price-cost margins across three levels of concentration. Large and small firm as well as industry average price-cost margins are analyzed. The results reaffirm those of Hirsch and Connolly (1987), who conclude that the effect of unions on profits is independent of market structure, and thus market power is not an important source of union rents. We find that unionization: (1) reduces industry profits in all three concentration groups with statistically insignificant differential effects, and (2) has a greater negative effect on the profits of large firms than it does on the profits of small firms, regardless of the concentration category.
Recommended Citation
Union Rents and Market Structure Revisited” (with William F. Chappell and Walter J. Mayer), Journal of Labor Research 12 (Winter 1991), pp. 35–46.