Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Economics Research Institute Study Paper
Volume
20
Publisher
Utah State University Department of Economics
Publication Date
2002
Rights
Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact the Institutional Repository Librarian at digitalcommons@usu.edu.
First Page
1
Last Page
22
Abstract
Two recent studies have shown that "cheap talk" is an effective means of eliminating positive hypothetical bias in experimental and field-auction settings. We further investigate the ability of cheap talk to mitigate positive hypothetical bias in a CVM phone survey administered to over 4,000 households. Positive hypothetical bias is first detected in our data by contrasting revealed and stated preference information. However, a short, neutral cheap-talk script appears to exacerbate rather than mitigate the bias. Based on this and mixed evidence from earlier studies, we suggest caution in using cheap talk as an ex ante control for hypothetical bias.
Recommended Citation
Aadland, David and Caplan, Arthur J., "Cheap Talk Reconsidered: New Evidence From CVM" (2002). Economic Research Institute Study Papers. Paper 253.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/eri/253