Economics Research Institute Study Paper
Utah State University Department of Economics
Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact the Institutional Repository Librarian at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Researchers commonly use nearby contract futures prices series in empirical analysis and commodity hedging applications based on the assumption that the maturing contract is always an appropriate proxy for more distant contracts. This paper discusses the implications of this practice based on econometric tests for equivalence between nearby and specific contract wheat futures price behavior. Nearby futures prices are inconsistent with each of the five contracts available on the Chicago Board of Trade.
Barrett, Christopher B.; Li, Jau-Rong; and Thilmany, Dawn D., "The Fallacy of Nearby Contract Commodity Futures Price Analysis: Intramarket Futures Contracts Are Not Identically Distributed" (1996). Economic Research Institute Study Papers. Paper 99.