Date of Award:
5-2012
Document Type:
Dissertation
Degree Name:
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department:
School of Teacher Education and Leadership
Committee Chair(s)
D. Ray Reutzel
Committee
D. Ray Reutzel
Committee
Jamison Fargo
Committee
Sylvia Read
Committee
Cindy Jones
Committee
Sarah Clark
Abstract
An investigation was conducted to determine the best criterion for advancement to a new reading passage during the commonly used classroom strategy of repeated reading. Knowing when to move students to a new passage during the repeated reading process was considered of value to teachers in efficiently using student learning time. The study also explored the effect of demographic variables (age, ethnicity, gender, SES, and beginning reading ability) on predicting outcome measures based on repeated reading scores.
A complex multi-level structural equation model was developed to study (a) the growth of student's ability to read words with speed and accuracy and (b) how student demographic features affect growth rates. This multilevel structural equation model used included two phases: multilevel growth modeling and path analysis. It was found that using a hot (or final) read-advancement criterion provided a better model fit than the hypothesized advancement criterion of a student's increase or gain between cold (beginning) and hot (final) reads. Also, student growth during repeated reading was found to be constant once a minimum words-read-correctly-per-minute (WRCM) criterion of 25 was reached. Repeated reading was shown to be a strategy that worked equally well for all students with little variance explained by the slope of student growth. Furthermore, the strategy was shown to be effective for non-White learners and showed promise in helping to close the achievement gap.
Checksum
3247d770932debfe14c543d71c5b14ae
Recommended Citation
Lewis, Gregory Paul, "Repeated Reading: Testing Alternative Models for Efficient Implementation" (2012). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 1171.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1171
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .
Comments
This work made publicly available electronically on April 12, 2012.