Date of Award:
5-1989
Document Type:
Thesis
Degree Name:
Master of Science (MS)
Department:
Economics and Finance
Department name when degree awarded
Economics
Committee Chair(s)
Donald L. Snyder
Committee
Donald L. Snyder
Committee
E. Bruce Godfrey
Committee
Darwin B. Nielsen
Committee
Norris Stenquist
Abstract
The main goals of this study are to: 1) identify the influence of various breeds, feeds, and hormone additives on the final weight or the rate of gain of feeder cattle; 2) determine the physical relationships among breeds, feeds, hormone additives, and other variables; and 3) estimate the costs and benefits associated with alternative feed and/or hormone additives and other variables to determine whether the benefits of using different breeds, feeds, and hormone additives exceed the costs. The linear mode l was initially chosen and showed that Rumensin additive and Angus and Simmental cross breeds were not significant on the basis of T test. The estimation, after excluding the nonsignificant variables, showed that Bovatec additive's impact on the total weight out was statistically negative and significant. Ralgro and Compudose hormones affected positively, and they were statistically significant, likewise breed (Tarantaise) affected positively on the tot al weight out and was statistically significant on the basis of T test.
The cost-benefit analyses explained that the values of the contribution of hormones Ralgro, Compudose and Tarantaise breed were exceed the cost of providing implants.
Checksum
c79b70bc8b0d262ca3ec0741a4a59ccd
Recommended Citation
Hani, Ibrahim R., "Incremental Returns to Cattle Feeding From Alternative Feedlot Practices" (1989). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 4088.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4088
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .