Date of Award:
5-2013
Document Type:
Dissertation
Degree Name:
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department:
Biology
Committee Chair(s)
Ethan P. White
Committee
Ethan P. White
Committee
Karen H. Beard
Committee
S. K. Morgan Ernest
Committee
Peter B. Adler
Committee
David N. Koons
Abstract
One of the most commonly observed patterns in ecology is the fact that at most locations there are a large number of relatively rare species, composed of only a few individuals per species, and a small number of relatively common species. This pattern of commonness and rarity is quantified by the species abundance distribution. As one of the most commonly observed patterns in ecology, it has been studied intensively for over 100 years.
A major emphasis of this research has been developing models to try to understand the forces that generate such a general pattern. As a result, there are now dozens of different models for how this pattern might be generated, and these models are based on at least five different major categories of forces. Because many of these models appear to match ecological observations reasonably well, it is difficult to tell which model or models are most likely to be correct.
To address this issue, I compiled data on over 16,000 ecological systems. I used the best available statistical methods to compare a number of different models to observed data. While there have been numerous comparisons of species abundance distribution models, most of these comparisons only use only a small subset of available models, focus on a single ecosystem or type of species, and fail to use the most appropriate statistical methods. My approach overcomes all of these challenges and thus provides the best opportunity to figure out which models provide the best description of real data.
Both general and detailed comparisons of this pattern of commonness and rarity suggest that even when using large amounts of data from across the world and the diversity of life, and the most current and powerful statistical methods, that it is generally not possible to distinguish among many common models of the species abundance distribution. I could exclude some models as clearly poorer descriptions of the pattern than others, but several models provided equivalently good descriptions of the data. This calls into question the potential for using the species abundance distribution to understand what processes are driving ecological systems.
Checksum
ff856a4bd2eaeeb4b69f19e266ccda9c
Recommended Citation
Baldridge, Elita, "A Data-Intensive Assessment of the Species Abundance Distribution" (2013). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 4276.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4276
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .