Date of Award:
12-2026
Document Type:
Dissertation
Degree Name:
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department:
Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences
Committee Chair(s)
Hillary Swanson
Committee
Hillary Swanson
Committee
Deborah Fields
Committee
Ha Nguyen
Committee
Lisa Lundgren
Committee
John Edwards
Abstract
In an effort to describe why some problems can’t be solved, a character compared them to a cubic meter of platinum - a block so dense that all the people who could squeeze around it still couldn’t lift it off the ground. In the same way, these problems simply can’t have enough people gathered around and communicating about them - and so they remain unsolved.
This research looks at the first Polymath Project (2009) as an example of a distributed epistemic game to examine how groups engage with complex problems. and without a locally omniscient individual. In this setting of epistemic uncertainty, interactions between individuals reveal patterns of participation, and an analogy opens a new solution pathway by introducing a problem-solving approach from another field.
These insights answer the initial question of the Polymath Project - ‘Is massively collaborative mathematics possible?’ - and offer hope for lifting the cubic meter of other unsolvable problems.
Recommended Citation
Matthews, Jenna, "Pieces Solving a Puzzle: Emerging Roles and Cross-Field Analogies During a Distributed Epistemic Game" (2026). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Fall 2023 to Present. 928.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd2023/928
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .