Policies and FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Journal Policies

Who can submit?

All undergraduate students at Utah State University are encouraged to submit research or creative works they have authored for publications.

All submissions must be reviewed and accepted by the student’s faculty mentor before they are accepted for submission. Every approved submission will be published.

{ top }

What is a working paper series?

Working papers are pre-publication versions of academic or creative articles. These papers are typically based on preliminary findings, but the work is complete enough to be shared. These papers may also be small parts of larger projects to be completed later. The thing to note is that these papers have the potential to evolve. While you may submit completed course-based research and other projects, this journal is most interested in seeking out research and creative work that is in progress.

{ top }

What types of submissions do you accept?

If you are working on a research project that is part of a larger lab project, you can submit your work for publication before collecting years of data! While we do require a portion of the research to be complete and effective enough to draw conclusions from, it is not required to be fully completed. Great examples of this are:

  • Course-based research that was part of a larger class project, but has solid conclusions on its own
  • Preliminary results of a pilot test that you are able to evaluate future directions from
  • Smaller studies on a topic outlined by a research lab or creative group you are in
  • Art pieces from a larger collection that you are creating
  • URCO Grant Reports
  • Honors Theses
  • and more!

{ top }

When should I submit my work?

Journal submissions are accepted year-round for online publication each spring.

{ top }

What you will need to submit

All materials must be submitted by the primary author. If you are in a group, discuss the author order prior to submission, as this is something of great importance in the academic field. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your faculty mentor.

You will need to provide the following:

  • Primary Author’s name, college, and department
  • Where you have presented/where you are planning to present the research or creative work (NECESSARY FOR PUBLICATION)
  • All Co-Author information
  • Faculty Mentor information
  • Your Project Title
  • A Technical Abstract
    • This would be the typical abstract required. It may include jargon, definitions, etc. This is so those who are in your field can understand what is technically happening.
  • Non-technical summary
    • This would be an abstract of your work that does not have any jargon or difficult terms. It will be reviewed for clarity. This is so those who are not in your field can get a grasp on what your research is.
  • Author Involvement Statement
    • This is a short statement that details how the primary author contributed to the research or creative work. It should list how they got involved in the project, what parts of the project they primarily focused on, and how they plan to leverage this opportunity in the future.
  • 1st letter of support
    • Written by the faculty mentor. For more information, see the Letter of Support tab.
  • One or two recommendations for reviewers
    • These should be faculty mentors who you have asked to potentially review your article. When you submit your work, we will reach out to these individuals to review your submission.
  • Any documents
    • Research articles, summaries of image/video submissions, etc.
  • Any images or videos
    • Art, short films, etc.
  • At least 3 Key words to describe your work
    • ie. undergraduate, neuroscience, fMRI…

{ top }

The application process

Curiosity will publish all acceptable student submissions. An acceptable submission has used the Journal Template and has been approved by a faculty mentor.


The first author on the project will submit their work to Curiosity through the form linked above. It is the first author’s responsibility to include all authors’ names on the submission. All submissions must be edited prior to submission. The Editorial Board will review each submission for necessary formatting and content edits. All research articles must follow the template in its entirety. If documents are in the incorrect format, they will be sent back to the student for corrections.

Mentor Review

The student(s) should make sure that their submission is approved by their mentor before submission. During the submission process, the author will be prompted to upload a Letter of Support written by their faculty mentor. For more information on what should be included in the letter of support, please see the Letter of Support tab.


When students submit their work, they should also submit one or two names and emails of faculty members who would be willing to review their work. The Board will reach out to these individuals to review the submitted work. Once the work has been reviewed, the student will receive an email stating that their work was accepted pending edits.


Once students have received their acceptance letter, they must complete the edits suggested, and send back their submission along with a Revision Response Letter.

{ top }

Letters of support and review suggestions

Every submission will require a Letter of Support, and one or two potential reviewers in order to be considered for publication.

Letter of Support

This letter of support will be submitted along with the initial submission materials and should be written by the student(s) faculty mentors. The mentor who writes this letter of support should be fully informed on what the project was, how it was completed, and how the student was involved in the project. This letter should include the following:

  • Outline of the qualifications of the author(s)
  • Outline how the project fits within the definition of undergraduate research or a creative opportunity
  • Provide a statement of support for the submission
  • If you have any questions about what is required in this letter, please contact Sophia Hessami at sophia.hessami@usu.edu.

    Suggested Reviewers

    Along with their submission materials, students should provide one or two names of faculty members who would be willing to review the student(s) work. Students should discuss this with the faculty members before submitting their names. The Board will reach out to these individuals after submission to begin the review process.

    { top }

    General submission rules

    Submitted articles cannot have been previously published, nor be forthcoming in an archival journal or book (print or electronic). by submitting material to Curiosity, the author is stipulating that the material is not currently under review at another journal (electronic or print) and that he or she will not submit the material to another journal (electronic or print) until the completion of the editorial decision process at Curiosity.

    Please note: "publication" in a working-paper series does not constitute prior publication.

    { top }

    Open access

    Curiosity is a diamond open access journal. It does not charge access fees, submission fees, or publication fees. The journal is supported by the Office of Research at Utah State University and by USU Libraries.

    { top }

    Author rights

    As further described in our submission agreement (the Submission Agreement), in consideration for publication of the article, the authors assign to DigitalCommons@USU all copyright in the article, subject to the expansive personal--use exceptions described below.

    { top }

    Journal sharing policies

    Reproduction, posting, transmission or other distribution or use of the article or any material therein, in any medium as permitted by a personal-use exemption or by written agreement of DigitalCommons@USU, requires credit to DigitalCommons@USU as copyright holder (e.g., DigitalCommons@USU © 2024).

    { top }

    General Terms and Conditions of Use

    Users of the DigitalCommons@USU website and/or software agree not to misuse the DigitalCommons@USU service or software in any way.

    The failure of DigitalCommons@USU to exercise or enforce any right or provision in the policies or the Submission Agreement does not constitute a waiver of such right or provision. If any term of the Submission Agreement or these policies is found to be invalid, the parties nevertheless agree that the court should endeavor to give effect to the parties' intentions as reflected in the provision, and the other provisions of the Submission Agreement and these policies remain in full force and effect. These policies and the Submission Agreement constitute the entire agreement between DigitalCommons@USU and the Author(s) regarding submission of the Article.

    { top }