Litterfall, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Inputs at Various Levels of Canopy Removal in Oak and Pine Stands in Northern Lower Michigan
American Midland Naturalist
Relatively little is known about the comparative effects of varying degrees of canopy cover in oak and pine stands on litterfall quantity and quality, which in turn have a major influence on litter decomposition rates and nutrient cycling processes. Thus, changes in litterfall and nutrient (N and P) inputs were examined over the 1st 2 yr following various levels of canopy removal in northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) and red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) stands in northern Lower Michigan. Selective canopy removal in experimental plots resulted in 25% (50% during the 1st yr) and 75% canopy cover. Comparisons were made with uncut references, which had an average canopy cover of 85%. As expected, the uncut stands had the highest litterfall during the 2-yr period (oak, 393 g m-2 yr-1; pine, 430 g m-2 yr-1), whereas the most heavily cut stands (25% canopy cover) had the lowest values (oak, 118 g m-2 yr-1; pine, 104 g m-2 yr-1). A small amount of canopy removal (75% canopy cover) in red oak stands led to significant reduction of litterfall and nutrient inputs, whereas the same treatment in red pine stands had little effect. In contrast, litterfall following the 25% canopy cover treatment decreased more in red pine stands than in red oak stands compared to the uncut stands. Annual total leaf litter N inputs at the same canopy cover levels were higher in red oak stands than in red pine stands. Lower N inputs in red pine stands were attributed to the low N concentrations in needle litter throughout the year, not to total leaf litter mass differences. These results indicate that the amount and quality of canopy removal were key factors in determining litterfall and nutrient inputs in these stands.
Sharik, Terry L.; Kim, Choosig; and Jurgensen, Martin F., "Litterfall, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Inputs at Various Levels of Canopy Removal in Oak and Pine Stands in Northern Lower Michigan" (1996). Wildland Resources Faculty Publications. Paper 1782.