Description

This project aims to further understand the current public perception of UAS and their integration into residential areas for package delivery through the development of vertiports The survey also aims to identify evidence of NIMBY (not in my backyard) in these perceptions. The survey specifically asked participants about demographics, familiarity with UAV, perceptions of UAV, and perceptions of vertiports through 6 different potential vertiport placements in residential of community center focused areas.

Author ORCID Identifier

Brent C. Chamberlain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-0828

Keunhyun Park https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-7833

OCLC

1266167570

Document Type

Dataset

DCMI Type

Dataset

File Format

.txt, .csv

Viewing Instructions

Dataset can be downloaded as a complete .zip file, or as the individual files in their original formats.

Publication Date

8-9-2021

Publisher

Utah State University

Methodology

The survey was developed and launched through Qualtrics. 209 participants completed the survey, with 9 being removed due to failing verification questions.

Start Date

3-16-2021

End Date

4-12-2021

Location

Wasatch Front (Greater Salt Lake), Utah

Language

eng

Code Lists

Column headings of data files (for tabular data): Question number and title are listed at the top of each column, Multipart questions are denoted with an underscore.

Comments

All anonymized 200 survey results are included in the .csv.

Some potentially identifiable data such as free response answers have been removed. Ages have been rounded to the nearest 5 value. Full data may be made available upon request.

Questions 54, 23, 28, 33, 41, 46, 53, 57, and 58 are all scored on a 5 point scale with matching terms, Generally, The less welcoming the lower the score between 1 and 5.

Terms:

1: "Extremely concerned", "Not at all useful", "A great deal", "Extremely inappropriate".

2: "Slightly beneficial", "Somewhat concerned", "A lot", "Somewhat inappropriate".

3: "Moderately beneficial", "Neither comfortable nor concerned", "A moderate amount", "Neither appropriate nor inappropriate".

4: "Very beneficial", "Somewhat comfortable", "A little", "Somewhat appropriate"

5: "Extremely beneficial", "Extremely comfortable", "None at all", "Extremely appropriate".

Disciplines

Agricultural and Resource Economics | Economics | Environmental Studies | Sociology | Technology and Innovation

License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Identifier

https://doi.org/10.26078/2yh7-r736

Checksum

8608d3644f200fd303366b0eadd3095f

Additional Files

README.txt (2 kB)
MD5: 6105cb79debb4938fa10378c756a6c3e

UAV_Preference_Study_Library_Archive.csv (201 kB)
MD5: baca7436d8e87354de8fa18a686b1686

Share

 
COinS