Description
This project aims to further understand the current public perception of UAS and their integration into residential areas for package delivery through the development of vertiports The survey also aims to identify evidence of NIMBY (not in my backyard) in these perceptions. The survey specifically asked participants about demographics, familiarity with UAV, perceptions of UAV, and perceptions of vertiports through 6 different potential vertiport placements in residential of community center focused areas.
Author ORCID Identifier
Brent C. Chamberlain https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-0828
Keunhyun Park https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-7833
OCLC
1266167570
Document Type
Dataset
DCMI Type
Dataset
File Format
.txt, .csv
Viewing Instructions
Dataset can be downloaded as a complete .zip file, or as the individual files in their original formats.
Publication Date
8-9-2021
Publisher
Utah State University
Methodology
The survey was developed and launched through Qualtrics. 209 participants completed the survey, with 9 being removed due to failing verification questions.
Start Date
3-16-2021
End Date
4-12-2021
Location
Wasatch Front (Greater Salt Lake), Utah
Language
eng
Code Lists
Column headings of data files (for tabular data): Question number and title are listed at the top of each column, Multipart questions are denoted with an underscore.
Disciplines
Agricultural and Resource Economics | Economics | Environmental Studies | Sociology | Technology and Innovation
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Identifier
https://doi.org/10.26078/2yh7-r736
Recommended Citation
Chamberlain, B. C., Hall, K., & Park, K. (2021). Public Perception of UAS and Vertiports in the Wastach Front Survey Results. Utah State University. https://doi.org/10.26078/2YH7-R736
Checksum
8608d3644f200fd303366b0eadd3095f
Additional Files
README.txt (2 kB)MD5: 6105cb79debb4938fa10378c756a6c3e
UAV_Preference_Study_Library_Archive.csv (201 kB)
MD5: baca7436d8e87354de8fa18a686b1686
Included in
Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Economics Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Sociology Commons, Technology and Innovation Commons
Comments
All anonymized 200 survey results are included in the .csv.
Some potentially identifiable data such as free response answers have been removed. Ages have been rounded to the nearest 5 value. Full data may be made available upon request.
Questions 54, 23, 28, 33, 41, 46, 53, 57, and 58 are all scored on a 5 point scale with matching terms, Generally, The less welcoming the lower the score between 1 and 5.
Terms:
1: "Extremely concerned", "Not at all useful", "A great deal", "Extremely inappropriate".
2: "Slightly beneficial", "Somewhat concerned", "A lot", "Somewhat inappropriate".
3: "Moderately beneficial", "Neither comfortable nor concerned", "A moderate amount", "Neither appropriate nor inappropriate".
4: "Very beneficial", "Somewhat comfortable", "A little", "Somewhat appropriate"
5: "Extremely beneficial", "Extremely comfortable", "None at all", "Extremely appropriate".