Telephone Adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS): The Cache County Study
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology
Volume
12
Issue
4
Publisher
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Publication Date
1999
First Page
270
Last Page
276
Abstract
Objective: To examine the concurrent validity of a newly developed telephone adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam. Background: Longitudinal studies of cognition may be advantaged by availability of assessment instruments that can be used over the telephone, as well as in person. Method: Subjects were 263 noninstitutionalized elderly residents of a rural community in southern Idaho, aged 65 to 93, who had little or no cognitive difficulty. At an average interval of four weeks, we administered the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) and the newly adapted Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (T3MS). Order of administration was randomly assigned. Results: Agreement between scores on the two instruments was good (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). When we applied various cutoff scores to the instruments, thereby generating assignments of individuals to "screen positive" and "screen negative" groups, the percent agreement in screening results ranged from 80% to 96% as we reduced the cutoff scores from 90 to 74 (100 points possible). Conclusions: At least among subjects without major cognitive syndromes, the Telephone Modified Mini-Mental State Exam provides a reasonable substitute for the more costly in-person 3MS. The telephone instrument should now be tested over a broader range of cognitive abilities in order to assess its validity in more impaired subjects, e.g., by studying an institutionalized sample.
Recommended Citation
Norton MC, Tschanz JT, Fan X, Plassman BL, Welsh-Bohmer KA, West N, Wyse BW, Breitner JCS. Telephone Adaptation of the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS). The Cache County Study. (1999). Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 1999;12: 270-276.
Comments
Originally published by Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins. Abstract available through remote link. Subscription required to access article fulltext.