Description
The preference-performance hypothesis states that ovipositing phytophagous insects will select host plants that are well-suited for their offspring and avoid host plants that do not support offspring performance (survival, development and fitness). The mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae), a native insect herbivore in western North America, can successfully attack and reproduce in most species of Pinus throughout its native range. However, mountain pine beetles avoid attacking Great Basin bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva), despite recent climate-driven increases in mountain pine beetle populations at the high elevations where Great Basin bristlecone pine grows. Low preference for a potential host plant species may not persist if the plant supports favorable insect offspring performance, and Great Basin bristlecone pine suitability for mountain pine beetle offspring performance is unclear. We infested cut bolts of Great Basin bristlecone pine and two susceptible host tree species, limber (P. flexilis) and lodgepole (P. contorta) pines with adult mountain pine beetles and compared offspring performance. To investigate the potential for host adaptation in offspring performance, we tested mountain pine beetles from populations within and outside of Great Basin bristlecone pine range. Although mountain pine beetles laid viable eggs in all three tree species, extremely few offspring emerged from Great Basin bristlecone pine, regardless of the beetle population. Our observed low offspring performance in Great Basin bristlecone pine corresponds with previously documented low mountain pine beetle attack preference. A low preference-low performance relationship suggests that Great Basin bristlecone pine resistance to mountain pine beetle is likely to be retained through climate-driven high-elevation mountain pine beetle outbreaks.
Author ORCID Identifier
Barbara J Bentz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2741-1542
Erika L. Eidson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-6284
OCLC
1078404132
Document Type
Dataset
DCMI Type
Dataset
File Format
.csv, .txt
Publication Date
3-14-2018
Funder
USDA, Forest Service (FS);
USDA, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
Publisher
Utah State University
Award Number
USDA, Forest Service (FS) WC-EM-F-14-1; USDA, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) UTAE-2010-03313
Methodology
See README file.
Referenced by
Eidson, E. L., Mock, K. E., & Bentz, B. J. (2018). Low offspring survival in mountain pine beetle infesting the resistant Great Basin bristlecone pine supports the preference-performance hypothesis. PLOS ONE, 13(5), e0196732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196732
Eidson, E. L. (2017). Great Basin Bristlecone Pine Resistance to Mountain Pine Beetle: An Evaluation of Dendroctonus ponderosae Host Selection Behavior and Reproductive Success in Pinus longaeva. M.S. Thesis. Utah State University. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6324/
Start Date
2015
End Date
2016
Location
Site: The site from which the host tree was cut. ìCaveMtnî = Cave Mountain, Nevada; ìDixieNFî = Dixie National Forest, Utah; ìLoganCanyonî = Logan Canyon, Utah.
Language
eng
Code Lists
Bristlecone = Great Basin bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva)
CVB = Cave Mountain Bristlecone
CVL = Cave Mountain Limber
DXB = Dixie Bristlecone
DXL = Dixie Limber
F = female
ID = identification
LCL = Logan Canyon Lodgepole
Limber = limber pine (Pinus flexilis)
Lodgepole = lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta)
M = male MPB = mountain pine beetle
NV = Nevada Spp = species
UT = Utah
For more details, see README file.
Disciplines
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | Entomology | Population Biology
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Bentz, B. J., Mock, K. E., & Eidson, E. L. (2018). Reproductive success of mountain pine beetle infesting cut bolts of Great Basin bristlecone pine, limber pine, and lodgepole pine. Utah State University. https://doi.org/10.15142/T38S7D
Checksum
d6c647e09de5b2dd7a24aa651e60dd46
Additional Files
Alldata_README.txt (21 kB)MD5: 61aa8f89b769575b2a2349f2d60368ab
Digital Commons Data.zip (39 kB)
MD5: 6864840f0ce61bcca9fa394aa992d408
Mating_and_Fecundity.csv (7 kB)
MD5: c194bd557e5fe8880a1f8462851eafb9
Offpsring_Emergence.csv (605 kB)
MD5: 1a1e59c27d4323109a7ff85f3d7e0d23
Offspring_Emergence_Galleries.csv (25 kB)
MD5: fcba2e9f60da6ce7b768e49f34a058f1
Offspring_Emergence_per_Bolt.csv (1 kB)
MD5: 5b3cff2baa30794db3b966bedc1742cb
Parent_Beetle_Size.csv (34 kB)
MD5: 064f3b387fe3f75de68874773be6f923
Phloem_Thickness.csv (1 kB)
MD5: 3e06e8b9aad7100cb2b79a8a04c7165c
Comments
Zip file contains all files that are listed individually.