Tracing Carbon and Nitrogen Reserve Remobilization During Spring Leaf Flush and Growth Following Defoliation

Authors

Ashley T. Hart, University of Alberta
Simon M. Landhäusser, University of Alberta
Erin Wiley, University of Central ArkansasFollow

Document Type

Article

Journal/Book Title/Conference

Tree Physiology

Publisher

Oxford University Press

First Page

1

Last Page

13

Publication Date

1-29-2024

Abstract

Woody plants rely on the remobilization of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) reserves to support growth and survival when resource demand exceeds supply at seasonally predictable times like spring leaf flush and following unpredictable disturbances like defoliation. However, we have a poor understanding of how reserves are regulated and whether distance between source and sink tissues affects remobilization. This leads to uncertainty about which reserves—and how much—are available to support plant functions like leaf growth. To better understand the source of remobilized reserves and constraints on their allocation, we created aspen saplings with organ-specific labeled reserves by using stable isotopes (¹³C,¹⁵N) and grafting unlabeled or labeled stems to labeled or unlabeled root stocks. We first determined which organs had imported root or stem-derived C and N reserves after spring leaf flush. We then further tested spatial and temporal variation in reserve remobilization and import by comparing (i) upper and lower canopy leaves, (ii) early and late leaves, and (iii) early flush and re-flush leaves after defoliation. During spring flush, remobilized root C and N reserves were preferentially allocated to sinks closer to the reserve source (i.e., lower vs upper canopy leaves). However, the reduced import of ¹³C in late versus early leaves indicates reliance on C reserves declined over time. Following defoliation, re-flush leaves imported the same proportion of root N as spring flush leaves, but they imported a lower proportion of root C. This lower import of reserve C suggests that, after defoliation, leaf re-flush rely more heavily on current photosynthate, which may explain the reduced leaf mass recovery of re-flush canopies (31% of initial leaf mass). The reduced reliance on reserves occurred even though roots retained significant starch concentrations (∼5% dry wt), suggesting that aspen prioritizes the maintenance of root reserves at the expense of fast canopy recovery.

Recommended Citation

Hart, A. T., S. M. Landhäusser, and E. Wiley. 2024. Tracing carbon and nitrogen reserve remobilization during spring leaf flush and growth following defoliation. Tree Physiology: tpae015.