Fortifying the Forest: Thinning and Burning Increase Resistance to a Bark Beetle Outbreak and Promote Forest Resilience

Document Type

Article

Journal/Book Title/Conference

Ecological Applications

Publication Date

2016

Issue

7

Volume

26

First Page

1984

Last Page

2000

Abstract

Fire frequency in low‐elevation coniferous forests in western North America has greatly declined since the late 1800s. In many areas, this has increased tree density and the proportion of shade‐tolerant species, reduced resource availability, and increased forest susceptibility to forest insect pests and high‐severity wildfire. In response, treatments are often implemented with the goal of increasing ecosystem resilience by increasing resistance to disturbance. We capitalized on an existing replicated study of fire and stand density treatments in a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa)–Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forest in western Montana, USA, that experienced a naturally occurring mountain pine beetle (MPB; Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreak 5 yr after implementation of fuels treatments. We explored whether treatment effects on tree‐level defense and stand structure affected resistance to MPB. Mortality from MPB was highest in the denser, untreated control and burn‐only treatments, with approximately 50% and 39%, respectively, of ponderosa pine killed during the outbreak, compared to almost no mortality in the thin‐only and thin‐burn treatments. Thinning treatments, with or without fire, dramatically increased tree growth and resin ducts relative to control and burn‐only treatments. Prescribed burning did not increase resin ducts but did cause changes in resin chemistry that may have affected MPB communication and lowered attack success. While ponderosa pine remained dominant in the thin and thin‐burn treatments after the outbreak, the high pine mortality in the control and burn‐only treatment caused a shift in species dominance to Douglas‐fir. The high Douglas‐fir component in the control and burn‐only treatments due to 20th century fire exclusion, coupled with high pine mortality from MPB, has likely reduced resilience of this forest beyond the ability to return to a ponderosa pine‐dominated system in the absence of further fire or mechanical treatment. Our results show treatments designed to increase resistance to high‐severity fire in ponderosa pine‐dominated forests in the Northern Rockies can also increase resistance to MPB, even during an outbreak. This study suggests that fuel and restoration treatments in fire‐dependent ponderosa pine forests that reduce tree density increase ecosystem resilience in the short term, while the reintroduction of fire is important for long‐term resilience.

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS