Is Dietary Choice Important to Animal Welfare?
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Journal of Veterinary Behavior
Volume
3
Issue
5
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Publication Date
9-2008
Recommended Citation
Manteca, X., Villalba, J., Atwood, S., Dziba, L., & Provenza, F. (2008). Is dietary choice important to animal welfare? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 3(5), 229-239. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2008.05.005
First Page
229
Last Page
239
Abstract
Scientific interest in farm animal welfare has grown rapidly in recent years because consumers increasingly demand that farm animals are reared, transported, and slaughtered in a humane way. Additionally, nutrition emerges as an important aspect of welfare since in most codes of recommendations for the welfare of animals, adequate nutrition is one of the primary requirements to be satisfied. We submit that in many cases domestic animals are provided with diets that, even when abundant and nutritious, are not necessarily adequate to foster the welfare of animals. The monotonous diets fed in confinement (total mixed rations) and on pasture (monocultures) often contain excesses of nutrients, nutrient imbalances, and toxins that adversely influence animal welfare. How much of any food an animal can eat will depend on the other foods it consumes, because at the biochemical level, nutrients and toxins interact one with another—nutrients with nutrients, nutrients with toxins, and toxins with toxins. Food intake and preference also depend on differences in how individual animals are built morphologically and how they function physiologically, and marked variation is common even among closely related animals relative to the needs for nutrients and tolerance to toxins. An integral part of an animal's ability to meet its particular nutritional requirements and consume substances that improve health depends on having a variety of foods available so each animal can select a diet that best meets its homeostatic needs. Food choice may also offer animals a means to cope with toxins, as certain food combinations have the potential to ameliorate the negative effects of toxins. We suggest that the availability of alternatives may not only contribute to maintain homeostasis but also reduce levels of stress. Thus, food choice is necessary for individual animals to have freedom to express their normal behaviors. We contend this freedom enables the uniqueness of individuals to be manifest, thereby promoting animal welfare and performance and increasing profitability of the people who manage animals.
Comments
Originally published by Elsevier.
Abstract available through remote link. Subscription required to access publisher's full text and PDF.