Effect of heat stress and oil formulation on conidial germination of Metarhizium anisopliae s. s. on tick cuticle and artificial medium

Document Type

Article

Journal/Book Title/Conference

Journal of Invertebrate Pathology

Volume

138

Publication Date

7-2016

Award Number

USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) 14-8130-0114; USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) 14-8130-0368

Funder

USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)

First Page

94

Last Page

103

Abstract

The effect of heat stress (45 °C) versus non-heat stress (27 °C) on germination of Metarhizium anisopliae sensu stricto (s.s.) isolate IP 119 was examined with conidia formulated (suspended) in pure mineral oil or in water (Tween 80, 0.01%), and then applied onto the cuticle of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (s.l.) engorged females or onto culture medium (PDAY). In addition, bioassays were performed to investigate the effect of conidia heated while formulated in oil, then applied to blood-engorged adult R. sanguineus females. Conidia suspended in water then exposed to 45 °C, in comparison to conidia formulated in mineral oil and exposed to the same temperature, germinated less and more slowly when incubated on either PDAY medium or tick cuticle. Also, conidial germination on tick cuticle was delayed in comparison to germination on artificial culture medium; for example, germination was 13% on tick cuticle 72 h after inoculation, in contrast to 61.5% on PDAY medium. Unheated (27 °C) conidia suspended in either water or oil and applied to tick cuticle developed appressoria 36 h after treatment; whereas only heat-stressed conidia formulated in oil developed appressoria on tick cuticle. In comparison to conidia heated in mineral oil, there was a strong negative effect of heat on germination of conidia heated in water before being applied to arthropod cuticle. Nevertheless, bioassays [based primarily on egg production (quantity) and egg hatchability] exhibited high percentages of tick control regardless of the type of conidial suspension; i.e., water- or oil-formulated conidia, and whether or not conidia were previously exposed to heat. In comparison to aqueous conidial preparations, however, conidia formulated in oil reduced egg hatchability irrespective of heat or no-heat exposure. In conclusion, mineral-oil formulation protected conidia against heat-induced delay of both germination and appressorium production when applied to the cuticle of R. sanguineus.

Comments

Published by Elsevier. DOI provides access to publisher page, from which article is accessible via subscription only.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS