Development of a Pedestrian Demand Estimation Tool (NITC-RR-677)
Document Type
Report
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Portland State University
Publisher
Portland State University
Publication Date
9-1-2015
First Page
1
Last Page
35
Abstract
Most research on walking behavior has focused on mode choice or walk-trip frequency. In contrast, this study is one of the first to analyze the destination choice behaviors of pedestrians. Using about 4,500 walk trips from a 2011 household travel survey in the Portland, OR, region, we estimated multinomial logit pedestrian destination choice models for six trip purposes. Independent variables included terms for impedance (walk-trip distance); size (employment by type, households); supportive pedestrian environments (parks, a pedestrian index of the environment variable called PIE); barriers to walking (terrain, industrial-type employment); and traveler characteristics. Unique to this study was the use of small-scale destination zone alternatives. Distance was a significant deterrent to pedestrian destination choice, and people in carless or childless households were less sensitive to distance for some purposes. Employment (especially retail) was a strong attractor: doubling the number of jobs nearly doubled the odds of choosing a destination for home-based shopping walk trips. More attractive pedestrian environments were also positively associated with pedestrian destination choice after controlling for other factors. These results shed light on determinants of pedestrian destination choice behavior, and sensitivities in the models highlight potential policy-levers to increase walking activity. In addition, the destination choice models can be used in regional travel demand models or as pedestrian planning tools to evaluate land use and transportation policy and investment scenarios.
Recommended Citation
Clifton, K. J., Singleton, P. A., Muhs, C. D., & Schneider, R. J. (2015). Development of a pedestrian demand estimation tool (NITC-RR-677). Portland, OR: National Institute for Transportation and Communities. http://doi.org/10.15760/trec.124