Document Type
Article
Author ORCID Identifier
Lia Ramos-Fernández https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-7188
José Huanuqueño-Murillo https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8511-4524
Elizabeth Heros-Aguilar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0179-3124
Edwin Pino-Vargas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-4364
Javier Quille-Mamani https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-7211
Alfonso Torres-Rua https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-9550
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Remote Sensing
Volume
16
Issue
20
Publisher
MDPI AG
Publication Date
10-18-2024
Journal Article Version
Version of Record
First Page
1
Last Page
29
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Abstract
In the context of global warming, rising air temperatures are increasing evapotranspiration (ETc) in all agricultural crops, including rice, a staple food worldwide. Simultaneously, the occurrence of droughts is reducing water availability, affecting traditional irrigation methods for rice cultivation (flood irrigation). The objective of this study was to determine ETc (water use) and yield performance in rice crop under different irrigation regimes: treatments with continuous flood irrigation (CF) and irrigations with alternating wetting and drying (AWD5, AWD10, and AWD20) in an experimental area in INIA–Vista Florida. Water balance, rice physiological data, and yield were measured in the field, and local weather data and thermal and multispectral images were collected with a meteorological station and a UAV (a total of 13 flights). ETc values obtained by applying the METRICTM (Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution using Internalized Calibration) energy balance model ranged from 2.4 to 8.9 mm d-1 for the AWD and CF irrigation regimes. In addition, ETc was estimated by a water balance using the AquaCrop model, previously parameterized with RGB image data and field weather data, soil, irrigation water, and crops, obtaining values between 4.3 and 7.1 mm d-1 for the AWD and CF irrigation regimes. The results indicated that AWD irrigation allows for water savings of 27 to 28%, although it entails a yield reduction of from 2 to 15%, which translates into an increase in water use efficiency (WUE) of from 18 to 36%, allowing for optimizing water use and improving irrigation management.
Recommended Citation
Ramos-Fernández, L.; Peña-Amaro, R.; Huanuqueño-Murillo, J.; Quispe-Tito, D.; Maldonado-Huarhuachi, M.; Heros-Aguilar, E.; Flores del Pino, L.; Pino-Vargas, E.; Quille-Mamani, J.; Torres-Rua, A. Water Use Efficiency in Rice Under Alternative Wetting and Drying Technique Using Energy Balance Model with UAV Information and AquaCrop in Lambayeque, Peru. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3882. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203882