Document Type
Unpublished Paper
Publication Date
2-27-2026
First Page
1
Last Page
4
Abstract
Lake Powell and Lake Mead are at risk of drawdown to their minimum power and dead pools in the next few years because current and proposed shortage and release operations tied to reservoir storage and sometimes prior natural flow cannot keep pace with U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s numerous scenarios of more volatile, declining, and longer-lasting periods of low flows. One experimental program to reduce risk can instead adapt reservoir releases to monitored changes in physical reservoir inflow and reservoir evaporation. First, stabilize reservoir storage by temporarily setting reservoir release to the physical reservoir inflow minus evaporation (the available water). Second, continue to stabilize storage by changing releases to match changes in physical reservoir inflow and evaporation. Third, build storage by decreasing releases from the release needed to stabilize reservoir storage. An experimental program has additional wins such as it can begin immediately or at any target reservoir elevation without the need for new agreements. A program can also stabilize and build reservoir storage even when low flows persist. Users who hold back some of their share of reservoir releases for later release can customize and adapt their strategies to manage future risks of water shortages. An experimental risk management program can help build operational experience and flexibility in a new era of low reservoir storage, volatile, declining, and longer-lasting low flows. We share links to further explore some of our new risk communication and adaptive management tools.
Recommended Citation
Fager, Brittany; Myers, Anabelle; Porse, Erik; and Rosenberg, David, "How a 2 to 5-Year Experimental Lake Powell and Lake Mead Release Program Tied to Reservoir Inflows can be a Win for Adaptive Risk Management" (2026). Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty Publications. Paper 3828.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cee_facpub/3828