Date of Award:
5-2013
Document Type:
Thesis
Degree Name:
Master of Science (MS)
Department:
Applied Economics
Committee Chair(s)
Man-Keun Kim
Committee
Man-Keun Kim
Committee
Donald L. Snyder
Committee
Ruby A. Ward
Abstract
This research examines the physical and economic feasibility of 5% biomass co-firing in the coal-fired power plants of Utah. Transportation models is used to find out the physical feasibility of 5% biomass co-firing, as well as locate the supply zone for each power plant that would minimize the transportation cost. Additional cost required for 5% biomass co-firing and the economic benefits associated with biomass co-firing are calculated. The additional cost required for 5% biomass co-firing is estimated to be $34.84 million. Previous studies on CO2 emission reduction are used to compute the economic benefit attain from CO2 reduction by selling carbon credits in the carbon trading market. Based on 2010 emission record in Utah, 5% biomass co-firing might bring the annual economic benefit of $11.37~$34.10 million assuming $16/ton of CO2 in the emission trading market. The regression model is used to find the relationship between PM emission and the human health damage. The regression results show that decreases in 1% of PM25 emission improves the human health in U.S. by 0.65%~0.67% in value and generates annual economic benefits of $6.72~$9.93 million in Utah. Altogether, the economic benefit from 5% biomass co-firing is estimated to be $38.55 million which is higher than the additional cost of biomass co-firing to generate electricity ($34.84 million). The benefit cost ratio is calculated as 1.107. Five percent biomass co-firing is economically feasible when benefits from all the positive externalities are included.
Checksum
c4f6e941110e1d09b4ebb94b79755b21
Recommended Citation
Paudel, Bibek, "Feasibility and Co-Benefits of Biomass Co-Firing: Case in Utah" (2013). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 1475.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1475
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .
Comments
This work made publicly available electronically on 5/2013