Date of Award:
5-2014
Document Type:
Dissertation
Degree Name:
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department:
Sociology and Anthropology
Department name when degree awarded
Sociology
Committee Chair(s)
Christy Glass
Committee
Christy Glass
Committee
Amy K. Bailey
Committee
Douglas Jackson-Smith
Committee
Erin Hofmann
Committee
Alison Cook
Abstract
While gender inequity in wages is often discussed in the media by politicians, the motherhood wage penalty receives substantially less attention. This distinct wage penalty suggests that women with children suffer a wage penalty separate from women without children. In addition, there is an employment gap between mothers and nonmothers indicating that mothers are less likely to be employed. While some argue that this is a matter of choice, I contend that mothers may face unique barriers that deny them access to the labor market. I tested this theory in two ways and in two states; Utah and California. First, I sent two applications to 480 companies; both applicants were women but one indicated that she was a mother. I then kept track of which applicants received follow-up emails or phone calls. If employers were biased and discriminated against mothers, I would expect that the “mother” candidate would receive fewer follow-up contacts. The second way I investigated this issue was by directly speaking with hiring managers at 27 of the companies that I applied to. I asked them questions regarding their ideal worker, gender preferences, and the relevance of family responsibilities in their hiring decisions. This research was funded by a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant.
Findings from both studies indicate that employers’ assumptions about mothers create a bias against them when they are being considered for employment. This project has significant societal benefits as it indicates that both the motherhood wage penalty and employment gap are not simply products of mothers choosing to opt out of the labor market. In addition, it suggests that cultural assumptions about motherhood may adversely affect women without children as they are perceived of being “at risk” of becoming mothers in the future. These penalties may also expand beyond the hiring and wage setting stages to performance and promotion issues.
Checksum
eb5d37232b55c9b0bbdb51756368bde8
Recommended Citation
Kiester, Elizabeth, "Mothers on the Market: Employer Hiring Practices and Motherhood Penalties" (2014). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 2771.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2771
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .