Date of Award:
5-1997
Document Type:
Dissertation
Degree Name:
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department:
Psychology
Committee Chair(s)
Lani Van Dusen (Committee Co-Chair), Xitao Fan (Committee Co-Chair)
Committee
Lani Van Dusen
Committee
Xitao Fan
Abstract
Learning style refers to the cognitive, physiological, emotional, environmental, sociological, and perceptual manner in which people learn. In order to provide students with an optimal learning environment, it is necessary to match instruction with students' learning style. To do this, student learning style must be assessed by a learning style instrument.
Of the learning style instruments that are currently available, most do not have much evidence of reliability and validity. Additionally, evidence that does exist is weak. Therefore, more psychometric data are needed regarding these instruments. This study provided psychometric evidence for six popular learning styles instruments, including the Learning Style Inventory, the Productivity Environmental Preferences Survey, the Learning Styles Profile, the Grasha-Riechmann's Student Learning Style Scale, the Edmonds Learning Style Identification Exercise, and the Group Embedded Figures Test.
Test-retest reliability was found to be good for the Group Embedded Figures Test and moderate for all other instruments. Internal structure validity of the instruments was good, indicating that the instruments do measure unique learning style constructs. However, convergent and discriminant validity evidence indicates that the instruments either do not measure the same constructs, or measure the learning style constructs in different ways.
Checksum
c17f7de0651c6030a2e0b0caa5c0c2bd
Recommended Citation
Snyder, Renee, "An Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of Scores Obtained by Six Popular Learning Styles Instruments" (1997). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 6109.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6109
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .