Date of Award:
8-2021
Document Type:
Thesis
Degree Name:
Master of Science (MS)
Department:
Political Science
Committee Chair(s)
Greg Goelzhauser
Committee
Greg Goelzhauser
Committee
Joshua Ryan
Committee
Anna Pechenkina
Abstract
Merit selection is a judicial selection system for when a state’s constitution or statute directs an independent nominating commission to evaluate applicants as a precursor to gubernatorial appointment. The initial process to fill a judicial vacancy under merit selection has three steps: application, nomination, and appointment. Proponents of the selection system insist that by de-emphasizing politics and highlighting qualifications, judicial diversification will be more likely to increase under merit selection. Yet, there is not a clear consensus as to whether merit selection systematically engenders a more diverse bench.
In this thesis, I explore whether women are less likely to apply to judgeships under merit selection. The results suggest women appear to be less likely to apply to judgeships compared to men. I demonstrate this by using data obtained through a public records request from New Mexico that consists of information on each applicant per judicial vacancy from 1998 through 2021. These results have important implications for judicial diversity under merit selection and political ambition more generally.
Checksum
5bdbe10ba0e472df60a4e0eeb31ecbff
Recommended Citation
Loftis, Logan M., "Gender and Political Incentives: Examining the Applicant Pool Under Merit Selection" (2021). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Spring 1920 to Summer 2023. 8123.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/8123
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .