Date of Award:
5-2024
Document Type:
Thesis
Degree Name:
Master of Science (MS)
Department:
Mathematics and Statistics
Committee Chair(s)
Stephen J. Walsh
Committee
Stephen J. Walsh
Committee
Brennan Bean
Committee
Yan Sun
Abstract
In metrology, the science of measurements, straight line calibration models are frequently employed. These models help understand the instrumental response to an analyte, whose chemical constituents are unknown, and predict the analyte’s concentration in a sample. Techniques such as ordinary least squares and generalized least squares are commonly used to fit these calibration curves. However, these methods may yield biased estimates of slope and intercept when the calibrant, substance used to calibrate an analytical procedure with known chemical constituents (x-values), carries uncertainty. To address this, Ripley and Thompson (1987) proposed functional relationship estimation by maximum likelihood (FREML), which considers uncertainties in both x and y variables, providing unbiased estimates of slope and intercept. This project aims to develop a robust mechanism for calculating uncertainty in final measurement quantities, integrating international standard guidelines such as GUM and parametric bootstrapping to handle uncertainties in both x and y calibration points. Initial validation follows Ripley and Thompson’s assumptions of known population standard deviations. Subsequently, the model is extended to accommodate cases where calibration input uncertainties are estimated, incorporating their degrees-of-freedom and propagating these uncertainties into parameter estimates.
Checksum
eb1bfce6adbe6a60e6cc5478eab0f5c5
Recommended Citation
Dayarathne, Aloka B. S. N., "A Comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification Methodology for Metrology Calibration and Method Comparison Problems Via Numeric Solutions to Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Parametric Bootstrapping" (2024). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Fall 2023 to Present. 173.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd2023/173
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .