Date of Award
5-2015
Degree Type
Report
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Department
Kinesiology and Health Science
Committee Chair(s)
Dale R. Wagner
Committee
Dale R. Wagner
Committee
Edward M. Heath
Committee
Eadric Bressel
Committee
Dennis G. Dolny
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two methodologies (start method and sprocket size) of the Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) on peak power (PP) and mean power (MP). Twenty power-trained males (24.6 ± 4.5 years; 25.4 ± 2.5 BMI) with the same exercise routine for the past 4 months performed, in a randomized order, four WAnT with different combinations of start method, flying (FLY) or stationary (STA), and front sprocket size, 62-tooth sprocket (S-62) or 85-tooth sprocket (S-85), using the Velotron Racermate®. The results showed main effects for start method (p < 0.001; ES 0.753) and sprocket size (p < 0.001; ES 0.69) for PP and MP, respectively. For PP, significantly (p < 0.001) higher mean differences were shown for both FLYs (14.4 w/kg) while MP showed significant (p < 0.01) increases for S-85 in combination with the FLY (10.9 W/kg) and for S-85 in combination with the STA (9.7 W/kg). Pearson correlation (r) revealed no significant relationship between same start methods, FLY (p > 0.05; r = 0.227) or STA (p > 0.05; r = -0.132), and same sprocket size, S-62 (p > 0.05; r = -0.179), or S-85 (p > 0.05; r = 0.240). In conclusion, the findings of this study showed that FLY start and S-85 elicited higher means for PP and MP, respectively.Furthermore, Velotron with S-85 should not be interchangeably used with the S-62 model for power outputs; results suggest that different sprockets favored subjects differently, and no relationship can be established for the two methods. FLY start is suggested as a more effective method to reach elevated PP.
Recommended Citation
Clark, Nicolas W., "Wingate Anaerobic Test Methods for Power-Trained Males Using Velotron" (2015). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports, Spring 1920 to Spring 2023. 565.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/565
Included in
Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .