Hydraulic Traits are Influenced by Phylogenetic History in the Drought‐resistant, Invasive genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae)
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
American Journal of Botany
Publication Date
2008
Volume
95
Issue
3
Abstract
In the conifer genus Juniperus (Cupressaceae), many species are increasing rapidly in distribution, abundance, and dominance in arid and semiarid regions. To help understand the success of junipers in drier habitats, we studied hydraulic traits associated with their water stress resistance, including vulnerability to xylem cavitation, specific conductivity (KS), tracheid diameter, conduit reinforcement, and wood density in stems and roots, as well as specific leaf area (SLA) of 14 species from the United States and the Caribbean. A new phylogeny based on DNA sequences tested the relationships between vulnerability to cavitation and other traits using both traditional cross‐species correlations and independent contrast correlations. All species were moderately to highly resistant to water‐stress‐induced cavitation in both roots and shoots. We found strong phylogenetic support for two clades previously based on leaf margin serration (serrate and smooth). Species in the serrate clade were 34–39% more resistant to xylem cavitation in stems and roots than were species in the smooth clade and had ∼35% lower KS and 39% lower SLA. Root and stem resistance to cavitation and SLA were all highly conserved traits. A high degree of conservation within clades suggests that hydraulic traits of Juniperus species strongly reflect phylogenetic history. The high resistance to cavitation observed may help explain the survival of junipers during recent extreme droughts in the southwestern United States and their expansion into arid habitats across the western and central United States.
Recommended Citation
C.J. Wilson, P.S. Manos, R.B. Jackson. 2008. HYDRAULIC TRAITS ARE INFLUENCED BY PHYLOGENETIC HISTORY IN THE DROUGHT-RESISTANT,INVASIVE GENUS JUNIPERUS (CUPRESSACEAE). American Journal of Botany. 95(3):299-314