Document Type

Article

Journal/Book Title/Conference

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

Author ORCID Identifier

Francisco Javier López Frías  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-7656

Volume

53

Publisher

Routledge

Publication Date

4-9-2026

Journal Article Version

Accepted Manuscript

First Page

293

Last Page

309

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the ongoing challenge of balancing player safety with the cultural significance of football. Recognizing that these tensions are likely to continue due to the sport’s importance in the United States, we critique the limitations of current paternalistic and anti-paternalistic approaches. A key shortcoming is their emphasis on individual autonomy, framing ethical discussions around this notion along with personal responsibility and informed consent. While these aspects are important, we argue that they neglect the systemic nature of risk and harm, as well as the responsibilities of sport governing bodies. Therefore, we propose an alternative, yet complementary, perspective that highlights the organizational duty of care. By drawing on concepts such as harm, vulnerability and fiduciary duties, we advocate for a shift towards emphasizing the care-related responsibilities that sport governing bodies owe to athletes. We conclude by underscoring the potential of this care-centric approach to transform discussions of dangerous sports within the philosophy of sport and related fields.

Comments

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2026.2634710.

Available for download on Saturday, October 09, 2027

Included in

Kinesiology Commons

Share

COinS