A Blended Professional Development Program to Help a Teacher Learn to Provide One-to-One Scaffolding
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Volume
26
Issue
3
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Publication Date
2-26-2015
First Page
263
Last Page
289
Abstract
Argumentation is central to instruction centered on socio-scientific issues (Sadler & Donnelly in International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488, 2006. doi:10.1080/09500690600708717). Teachers can play a big role in helping students engage in argumentation and solve authentic scientific problems. To do so, they need to learn one-to-one scaffolding—dynamic support to help students accomplish tasks that they could not complete unaided. This study explores a middle school science teacher’s provision of one-to-one scaffolding during a problem-based learning unit, in which students argued about how to optimize the water quality of their local river. The blended professional development program incorporated three 1.5-h seminars, one 8-h workshop, and 4 weeks of online education activities. Data sources were video of three small groups per period, and what students typed in response to prompts from computer-based argumentation scaffolds. Results indicated that the teacher provided one-to-one scaffolding on a par with inquiry-oriented teachers described in the literature.
Recommended Citation
Belland, B. R., Burdo, R., & Gu, J. (2015). A Blended Professional Development Program to Help a Teacher Learn to Provide One-to-One Scaffolding. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 26 (3), 263-289.
Included in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Instructional Media Design Commons, Library and Information Science Commons
