Document Type
Presentation
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Asia-Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity: Creating a Culture of Integrity
Location
Wollengong, Australia
Publication Date
9-29-2009
First Page
1
Last Page
16
Abstract
Little actual research has been conducted to explore the ethics of the faculty of higher education. A review of the literature has discovered four primary categories of faculty ethics, which include scholarship, teaching, service, and professional (e.g., consulting, treatment of colleagues and peers). This paper will focus on the scholarship category and includes research (e.g., authorship, conflicts of interest, plagiarism/citing-including self-plagiarism, ethical approval, research design, redundant publications, misconduct, accuracy, personal criticism of others) and review of other's work as a reviewer or editor (e.g., unbiased, speed/timeliness, accuracy, responsibility, objectivity, confidentiality, conflicts of interest). The purpose of this paper is to survey and classify key ideas in the literature, present research propositions, and outline ideas for future research in this area.
Recommended Citation
Madsen, Susan R. and Davis, James H., "Faculty Ethics Unveiled: Scholarship—Et tu, Brute?" (2009). Marketing and Strategy Faculty Publications. Paper 352.
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/marketing_facpub/352