All Physics Faculty Publications
Interhemispheric Comparison of TDIM E- and F-Region Ionospheres on 14 January 1988
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Volume
61
Issue
15
Publication Date
1999
First Page
1157
Last Page
1168
Abstract
The USU time-dependent ionospheric model (TDIM) simulated the northern (winter) and southern (summer) ionospheres as they responded to the changing solar wind and geomagnetic activity on 14 January 1988. This period began with moderately disturbed conditions, but as the IMF turned northward, the geomagnetic activity decreased. By 1400 UT, the IMF By component became strongly negative with Bz near zero; and eventually Bz turned southward. This began a period of intense activity as a magnetic storm developed. The magnetospheric electric field and auroral electron precipitation drivers for these simulations were obtained from the Naval Research Laboratories (NRL) Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) magnetospheric simulation for this event. The F-region ionospheric simulations contrast the summer–winter hemispheres. Then, the difference in how the two hemispheres respond to the geomagnetic storm is related to the differences in magnetospheric energy deposition in the two hemispheres. This also emphasizes the role played by the E-region in the magnetosphere–ionosphere (M–I) coupling and subsequent lack of conjugacy in the two hemispheres. The F-region’s response to the changing geomagnetic conditions also demonstrates a striking lack of conjugacy. This manifests itself in a well-defined ionospheric morphology in the summer hemisphere and a highly irregular morphology in the winter hemisphere. These differences are found to be associated with the differences in the magnetospheric electric field input.
Recommended Citation
Sojka, J. J., R. W. Schunk, M. David, J. Chen, S. Slinker, and J. Fedder, Interhemispheric comparison of TDIM E- and F-Region ionospheres on 14 January 1988, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 61, 1157-1168, 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(99)00047-4
Comments
Originally published by Elsevier. Publisher’s PDF available through remote link. Subscription is required.