Power, Status and Expectations: How Narcissism Manifests Among Women CEOs
Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Journal of Business Ethics
Volume
158
Issue
4
Publisher
Springer Dordrecht
Publication Date
11-15-2017
First Page
893
Last Page
907
Abstract
Firms face mounting pressure to appoint ethical leaders who will avoid unnecessary risk, scandal and crisis. Alongside mounting evidence that narcissistic leaders place organizations at risk, there is a growing consensus that women are more ethical, transparent and risk-averse than men. We seek to interrogate these claims by analyzing whether narcissism is as prevalent among women CEOs as it is among men CEOs. We further analyze whether narcissistic women CEOs take the same types of risk as narcissistic men CEOs. Drawing on social role and token theories, we test hypotheses related to gender diferences in the prevalence and impact of CEO narcissism on frm-level practices. Using a unique dataset that includes a large sample of CEOs of S&P 1500 companies from 1992 through 2014, we create a narcissism composite score for each CEO based on their photograph size in the annual report, and their cash earnings and non-cash earnings relative to the next highest paid executive. We fnd that women CEOs are less likely to exhibit narcissistic personality traits compared to men CEOs. Furthermore, we fnd that gender moderates the relationship between narcissistic CEOs and our outcome variables of risk-taking and questionable behaviors.
Recommended Citation
Ingersoll, Alicia, Christy Glass, Alison Cook and Kari Olsen. 2019. “Power, Status and Expectations: How Narcissism Manifests Among Women CEOs.” Journal of Business Ethics 158(4): 893-907.