Response to Leal-Idrogo's “Further Thoughts”

Document Type

Article

Journal/Book Title/Conference

Journal of Rehabilitation

Volume

61

Publication Date

1995

First Page

24

Last Page

25

Abstract

We welcome the opportunity to respond to Anita Leal-Idrogo's perceptive thoughts regarding the use of translators/interpreters in rehabilitation. Both our article and Leal-Idrogo's critique serve to highlight the language needs of linguistically isolated rehabilitation clients. We agree on the importance of bringing the needs of non-English speaking clients into the forefront and we find ourselfs in agreement with many of the specific issues raised in her commentary.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS