Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Location
Ithaca, New York
Start Date
27-9-1983 12:00 AM
Description
Few objective estimates are available, but starling (Sturnus uulgaris) and, sometimes, blackbird (e.g., Agelaius phoeniceus) depredations at feedlots are considered serious economic problems (Besser et al. 1967, 1968; Feare 1975, 1980; Stickley 1979; Twedt and Glahn 1982). Losses may result either from feed contamination and disease transmission or, more likely, from feed consumption (Besser et al. 1968; Russell 1975; Twedt and Glahn 1982). These problems are exacerbated by the use of complete diets (Rickaby 1978) which are presented in open troughs to which starlings have access. Feare and Wadsworth (1981) have shown that these birds can take up to 9% of the high protein fraction of the diet, thus depriving cattle of their high energy source and altering the composition of the entire ration. Efforts to control problem birds at feedlots have focused mainly on attempts to trap or kill birds with mechanical devices or chemical agents (Besser et al. 1967; Bogadich 1968; Levingston 1967; Westetal.1967; Feareetal.1981). These approaches, however, fail to create a suboptimal environment for avian feeding activity, and birds rapidly reinfest feedlots when control measures are relaxed (Twedt and Glahn 1982). Additional problems arise when lethal chemicals; such as Starlicide (1% C-chloro-p-toludine hydrochloride on poultry pellets) are used, including: (1) potential primary and secondary hazards to nontarget animals (e.g., Cunningham, 1979), (2) bait aversion by target birds, (3) expense and labor in prebaiting, baiting and monitoring (Glahn 1981) and (5) rather short-term effectivenses when large numbers of birds are in the area (Feare et al. 1981).
Recommended Citation
Mason, J. R., Arzt, A. H., & Reidinger, R. F. (1983). Evaluation of dimethyl anthranilate as a nontoxic starling repellent for feedlot settings. In Decker, D. J. (Ed.), The First Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference (pp. 259-263). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Included in
Evaluation of Dimethyl Anthranilate as a Nontoxic Starling Repellent for Feedlot Settings
Ithaca, New York
Few objective estimates are available, but starling (Sturnus uulgaris) and, sometimes, blackbird (e.g., Agelaius phoeniceus) depredations at feedlots are considered serious economic problems (Besser et al. 1967, 1968; Feare 1975, 1980; Stickley 1979; Twedt and Glahn 1982). Losses may result either from feed contamination and disease transmission or, more likely, from feed consumption (Besser et al. 1968; Russell 1975; Twedt and Glahn 1982). These problems are exacerbated by the use of complete diets (Rickaby 1978) which are presented in open troughs to which starlings have access. Feare and Wadsworth (1981) have shown that these birds can take up to 9% of the high protein fraction of the diet, thus depriving cattle of their high energy source and altering the composition of the entire ration. Efforts to control problem birds at feedlots have focused mainly on attempts to trap or kill birds with mechanical devices or chemical agents (Besser et al. 1967; Bogadich 1968; Levingston 1967; Westetal.1967; Feareetal.1981). These approaches, however, fail to create a suboptimal environment for avian feeding activity, and birds rapidly reinfest feedlots when control measures are relaxed (Twedt and Glahn 1982). Additional problems arise when lethal chemicals; such as Starlicide (1% C-chloro-p-toludine hydrochloride on poultry pellets) are used, including: (1) potential primary and secondary hazards to nontarget animals (e.g., Cunningham, 1979), (2) bait aversion by target birds, (3) expense and labor in prebaiting, baiting and monitoring (Glahn 1981) and (5) rather short-term effectivenses when large numbers of birds are in the area (Feare et al. 1981).