Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Location
North Carolina State University
Start Date
22-9-1985 12:00 AM
Description
The effects of grazing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) by Canada geese (Branta canadensis) was assessed in 3 fields during 2 years of experimentation at the Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, Maryland. Randomly placed wire enclosures prevented goose grazing on 11.1 m sq. control plots. Grazed plots were marked in each field soon after the geese migrated in March. Grazed plots had consistently lower yields than ungrazed plots with mean differences ranging from 0-13%. The differences were related to the intensity of grazing. Other parameters, including mean weight per seed, mean number of seeds per spike, mean number of spikes per plot, mean plant height and head date, were also measured. Statistically significant differences were found for many of these variables between grazed and ungrazed plots. The estimates of yield reduction were probably conservative in that the presence of control exclosures may have discouraged goose use of experimental fields compared to other fields in the vicinity.
Recommended Citation
Allen Jr, H. A., Sammons, D., Brinsfield, R., & Limpert, R. (1985). The effects of Canada goose grazing on winter wheat: An experimental approach. In Bromley, P. T. (Ed.), The Second Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference (pp. 135-141). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Included in
The Effects of Canada Goose Grazing on Winter Wheat: An Experimental Approach
North Carolina State University
The effects of grazing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) by Canada geese (Branta canadensis) was assessed in 3 fields during 2 years of experimentation at the Wye Research and Education Center, Queenstown, Maryland. Randomly placed wire enclosures prevented goose grazing on 11.1 m sq. control plots. Grazed plots were marked in each field soon after the geese migrated in March. Grazed plots had consistently lower yields than ungrazed plots with mean differences ranging from 0-13%. The differences were related to the intensity of grazing. Other parameters, including mean weight per seed, mean number of seeds per spike, mean number of spikes per plot, mean plant height and head date, were also measured. Statistically significant differences were found for many of these variables between grazed and ungrazed plots. The estimates of yield reduction were probably conservative in that the presence of control exclosures may have discouraged goose use of experimental fields compared to other fields in the vicinity.