Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Location
Ithaca, New York
Start Date
6-10-1991 12:00 AM
Description
Black bear (Ursus americanus) are common in northern Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) has established a population goal of 6,000 bears across 46,361 km2 of bear range. Bear damage to agriculture has occurred for over 50 years, and various strategies have been used to address these problems. Bear damage to agricultural crops and livestock became eligible for reimbursement by the state in 1939. The legislature terminated this program in 1980 in favor of a new program that placed greater emphasis on damage prevention than on compensation. Since 1984, WDNR has managed bear damage primarily through abatement practices including electric fencing, scare devices, repellents, trapping and translocating problem bears, and damage compensation provided by the Wildlife Damage Abatement and Claims Program (WDACP). Recently, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Animal Damage Control (ADC) has become an increasingly important partner with WDNR and WDACP counties in providing bear damage program services. Wisconsin bear management and damage costs total about $250,000 annually in 23 counties. Annual levels of assessed damage vary greatly from year to year, averaging $5,400 per county per year, with WDACP program costs averaging about $2,000 per county per year. Annual state costs for trapping and relocation of problem bears are approximately $70,000. Bear depredations to sheep have drastically declined, from 52% of claims between 1939-1956 to less than 2% from 1986 through 1990, because of decreases in stock-sheep numbers and improved husbandry. Com damage has dramatically increased, from 10% between 1939-1956 to 65 % of damage claims during 1986-1990, due to increased use of short-maturity com varieties during the late 1970s to the present The attraction of bear to these varieties may require planting schemes to divert damage away from fields with lure crops. The primary abatement practice is culvert trapping and translocation . Wisconsin will continue to seek improvement and adjustment of its bear damage management program.
Recommended Citation
Stowell, L. R., & Willging, R. C. (1991). Bear damage to agriculture in Wisconsin. In Curtis, P. D., Fargione, M. J., & Caslick, J. E. (Eds.), The Fifth Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference (pp. 96-104). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Included in
Bear Damage to Agriculture in Wisconsin
Ithaca, New York
Black bear (Ursus americanus) are common in northern Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) has established a population goal of 6,000 bears across 46,361 km2 of bear range. Bear damage to agriculture has occurred for over 50 years, and various strategies have been used to address these problems. Bear damage to agricultural crops and livestock became eligible for reimbursement by the state in 1939. The legislature terminated this program in 1980 in favor of a new program that placed greater emphasis on damage prevention than on compensation. Since 1984, WDNR has managed bear damage primarily through abatement practices including electric fencing, scare devices, repellents, trapping and translocating problem bears, and damage compensation provided by the Wildlife Damage Abatement and Claims Program (WDACP). Recently, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Animal Damage Control (ADC) has become an increasingly important partner with WDNR and WDACP counties in providing bear damage program services. Wisconsin bear management and damage costs total about $250,000 annually in 23 counties. Annual levels of assessed damage vary greatly from year to year, averaging $5,400 per county per year, with WDACP program costs averaging about $2,000 per county per year. Annual state costs for trapping and relocation of problem bears are approximately $70,000. Bear depredations to sheep have drastically declined, from 52% of claims between 1939-1956 to less than 2% from 1986 through 1990, because of decreases in stock-sheep numbers and improved husbandry. Com damage has dramatically increased, from 10% between 1939-1956 to 65 % of damage claims during 1986-1990, due to increased use of short-maturity com varieties during the late 1970s to the present The attraction of bear to these varieties may require planting schemes to divert damage away from fields with lure crops. The primary abatement practice is culvert trapping and translocation . Wisconsin will continue to seek improvement and adjustment of its bear damage management program.