Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Ecology Letters
Author ORCID Identifier
Daniel R. MacNulty https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9173-8910
Elaine M. Brice https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-4065
Volume
00
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Publication Date
11-27-2023
Journal Article Version
Author's Original
First Page
1
Last Page
7
Abstract
Although sampling the five tallest young aspen in a stand is useful for detecting the occurrence of any aspen recruitment, this technique overestimates the population response of aspen to wolf reintroduction. Our original conclusion that random sampling described a trophic cascade that was weaker than the one described by non-random sampling is unchanged.
Recommended Citation
MacNulty, D.R., Brice, E.M. & Larsen, E.J. (2023) Non-random sampling measures the occurrence but not the strength of a textbook trophic cascade. Ecology Letters, 00, 1–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14344
Comments
This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: MacNulty, D.R., Brice, E.M. & Larsen, E.J. (2023) Non-random sampling measures the occurrence but not the strength of a textbook trophic cascade. Ecology Letters, 00, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14344, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14344. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.