Document Type
Article
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Journal of Technology Education
Volume
17
Issue
1
Publisher
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Publication Date
2006
First Page
36
Last Page
53
Abstract
Subjects for which aesthetics and creative performance are critical curricular dimensions (such as art, physical education, music, and technology education), and which are accommodative of students across the range of intelligences (Gardner, 1999) are not readily or completely captured by content standards. Therefore content knowledge in these fields that target student achievement as conventionally conceived must be complemented by treatment of more subjective and elusive goals such as the development of connoisseurship, appreciation, or creative insight. With the publication of standards for the subject (International Technology Education Association, 2000), the need for focus upon creativity in technology education has been made more urgent than before because of the prominence given to the teaching and learning of design. Four of the standards (8, 9, 10, and 11) address design directly. Technological design is a medium through which dimensions of children’s creative abilities can be stimulated and augmented. This creative potential of design teaching can be seen in the work of Druin & Fast (2002), where Swedish children who are included in the design of technology reveal inventive dispositions in their journaling. It can be seen also in the work of Foster and Wright, 2001; Gustafson, Rowell and Guilbert, 2000; Neumann, 2003; and Parkinson, 2001.
Recommended Citation
Lewis, T. (2006). Creativity: A framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education, Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 36-53.
Comments
Originally published by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. HTML fulltext available through the Journal of Technology Education.