Document Type
Article
Author ORCID Identifier
Roxana Peña-Amaro https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9788-5821
José Huanuqueño-Murillo https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8511-4524
Lia Ramos-Fernández https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-7188
Lena Cruz-Villacorta https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-533X
Elizabeth Heros-Aguilar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0179-3124
Edwin Pino-Vargas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-4364
Alfonso Torres-Rua https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-9550
Journal/Book Title/Conference
Remote Sensing
Volume
18
Issue
6
Publisher
MDPI AG
Publication Date
3-10-2026
Journal Article Version
Version of Record
First Page
1
Last Page
29
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Abstract
Precise estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) is essential for sustainable water management in arid agroecosystems, particularly for high-water-demand crops such as rice. This study integrated very-high-resolution UAV thermal–multispectral imagery with a Two-Source Energy Balance model (UAV–TSEB) and a field-calibrated AquaCrop model to quantify daily ET and its components under continuous flooding on the arid Peruvian coast during the 2024–2025 season. A network of 24 drainage lysimeters provided an independent observational benchmark (ETlys); to represent the treatment-level response, lysimeter observations were aggregated as the mean across the 24 units for each UAV campaign. Thirteen UAV surveys supplied radiometric surface temperature and biophysical inputs (e.g., NDVI and fractional cover) to derive spatially explicit ET, while AquaCrop provided continuous daily simulations between flight dates. Direct lysimeter-based validation indicated high agreement for AquaCrop (R2 = 0.85; RMSE = 0.26 mm d−1; MBE = 0.01 mm d−1) and moderate agreement for UAV–TSEB (R2 = 0.66; RMSE = 0.81 mm d−1; MBE = 1.01 mm d−1). Model intercomparison further showed consistent temporal dynamics of ET (R2 = 0.70; RMSE = 1.35 mm d−1) and robust partitioning of crop transpiration (R2 = 0.79; RMSE = 0.99 mm d−1) and soil evaporation (R2 = 0.76; RMSE = 1.03 mm d−1) while revealing a systematic divergence under near-complete canopy cover: AquaCrop tended to suppress evaporation, whereas UAV–TSEB detected residual evaporation from the flooded surface. Overall, the results highlight the complementarity of both approaches—UAV–TSEB as a spatial diagnostic tool and AquaCrop as a temporally continuous simulator—providing a robust framework for ET monitoring, flux partitioning, and water-use-efficiency assessment in water-scarce rice systems.
Recommended Citation
Peña-Amaro, R.; Huanuqueño-Murillo, J.; Ramos-Fernández, L.; Ramos-Ayala, A.; Quispe-Tito, D.; Cruz-Villacorta, L.; Heros-Aguilar, E.; Pino-Vargas, E.; Torres-Rua, A. Comparative Assessment of UAV-Based TSEB and Field-Calibrated AquaCrop for Evapotranspiration on the Arid Coast of Peru. Remote Sens. 2026, 18, 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18060856