Date of Award:

8-2024

Document Type:

Thesis

Degree Name:

Master of Science (MS)

Department:

Sociology and Anthropology

Committee Chair(s)

Anna Cohen

Committee

Anna Cohen

Committee

David Byers

Committee

Jacob Freeman

Committee

Amy Steffian

Abstract

Why do groups choose to use certain technologies, but not others? This study focuses on an especially confusing instance of this question: the adoption of pottery in Kodiak, Alaska. This event was strange for two reasons. First, by AD 1500, when Alutiiq ancestors in the Kodiak Archipelago began making pottery, their neighbors on the mainland had already been doing it for centuries—so why did they wait so long? Second, pottery is also only found in the south of the islands—so why did some people use it, but not others? Whale and seal are more abundant in southern Kodiak, so one potential explanation is that the pottery was made because southern villages were starting to render larger amounts of marine mammal oil. I reconstructed the pottery of Kodiak to try to understand whether this hypothesis makes sense. Are Alutiiq pots actually a better way to mass-produce marine mammal oil than other traditional rendering methods? What conditions should favor the use of pottery? This study lays out what I've learned about Kodiak pottery and what this tells us about what was going on in the region, as well as the implications for our understanding of pottery use in general.

Checksum

32bbddc0d45b14973cb5e352ef7d531b

Download

Share

COinS

Copyright for this work is retained by the student. If you have any questions regarding the inclusion of this work in the Digital Commons, please email us at .